Document Type
Thesis
Abstract
This capstone paper delves deeply into the ramifications of prison privatization on inmates' quality of life in contracted immigration detention facilities. With the increasing inclination towards privatizing correctional institutions, especially immigration detention centers, a rigorous evaluation is indispensable to ascertain the ramifications of such privatizations on the welfare of incarcerated individuals. In this exploration, Logan's quality of confinement model is meticulously applied to selected immigration detention centers to scrutinize the living conditions and reveal profound insights into the quality of life experienced by inmates. This model allows a structured assessment of various dimensions such as safety, order, care, activity, management, justice, conditions, and design within the confines of the selected facilities, providing a comprehensive perspective on the living conditions therein. This encompassing exploration exposes the contradiction between the pursuits of profit maximization and the commitment to delivering quality services in privatized immigration detention environments. The analysis reveals intricate and nuanced repercussions, highlighting the detrimental aspects of prison privatization within the realm of immigration detentions, and illuminates the inherently conflicting interests and the impact on the provision of essential services and the well-being of detainees. Finally, the study's findings are crucial, enhancing understanding and informing future discourse, policy formulation, and practices about privatizing correctional institutions and immigration detention centers.
Recommended Citation
Ahmed, Hafsa, "Prison Privatization and its Impacts on Inmate Quality of Life: An Analysis Through Logan's Eight Dimensions Model" (2025). Master in Public Administration Theses. 31.
https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/dyson_mpa/31
Included in
Infrastructure Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Policy Commons
Comments
Submitted to Dr. Scutelnicu