Reversing Course: A Critique of the Court of Appeals New Rules for Unjust Enrichment and Criminal Legal Malpractice Actions

Authors

Jay C. Carlisle II, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This article will discuss recent developments by the New York Court of Appeals on the doctrine of unjust enrichment and on the elimination of non-pecuniary damages in criminal legal malpractice actions. Specifically, the article will examine the cases of Georgia Malone & Co. v. Ralph Rieder and Dombrowski v. Bulson.

Recommended Citation

Jay C. Carlisle II, Reversing Course: A Critique of the Court of Appeals New Rules for Unjust Enrichment and Criminal Legal Malpractice Actions, 76 Alb. L. Rev. 1211 (2013), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/892/.