Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections still impact judicial decision making. Using the State of Wisconsin as an example, this Essay suggests that Wisconsin and other state legislatures, with the support of bar associations and academics, should revisit the historical underpinnings of judicial elections and consider both whether electing judges conforms with the historical goals of having an elected judiciary and whether the available empirical data support the belief that elected judges can be systematically consistent and independent in the decision making process.
Jason J. Czarnezki, A Call for Change: Improving Judicial Selection Methods, 89 Marq. L. Rev. 169 (2005), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/902/.