Abstract
Since 1956, there have been three waves of scholarly attention on the misdemeanor courts. Despite this attention, misdemeanor courts remain understudied and overlooked. The object of this paper is to summarize the empirical research conducted over the last sixty years and identify the scholarly work that should be undertaken on the processing of misdemeanor offenders in our courts. Buoyed by the current interest in studying the misdemeanor courts, scholars should widen and deepen their study by replicating the work of others in a variety of jurisdictions, observing court proceedings, interviewing defendants and the courtroom workgroup, and assessing whether constitutional ideals are being upheld by our misdemeanor courts.
Recommended Citation
Alisa Smith, Empiricism and the Misdemeanor Courts: Promoting Wider, Deeper, and Interdisciplinary Study, 39 Pace L. Rev. 453 (2018)DOI: https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.1992
Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol39/iss1/8