Since the invasion of Afghanistan, the United States has utilized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to locate, surveil and kill members of the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and its associated forces. Such killings have decimated the leadership of these groups and disrupted their operations. However, there are collateral effects from UAV killings including civilian deaths. These deaths increase resentment and hatred toward the US, which is channeled by terrorist groups to recruit new members and for local support. Moreover, targeted killings outside a combat zone have political and diplomatic consequences. This paper argues that the current uses of UAV are legal under international and domestic law. However, it proposes amended targeting criteria, greater transparency and increased checks on the executive branch for future use of UAVs.
Recommended CitationMichael J. Deegan, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Legitimate Weapon Systems or Unlawful Angels of Death?, 26 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 249 (2014)
Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol26/iss2/7