Document Type
Article
Abstract
As people, especially older people, begin to develop dementia, we confront ethical questions about when and how to intervene in their increasingly compromised decision-making. The prevailing approach in philosophically-inclined bioethics to tackling this challenge has been to develop theories of “decision-making capacity” based on the same characteristics that entitle the decisions of moral persons to respect in general. This Article argues that this way of thinking about the problem has missed the point. Because the disposition of property is an identity-dependent right, what matters in dementia and decision-making is an individual’s personal identity with their prior self, not their moral personhood. Therefore, in considering when and how we ought to intervene in the decision-making of those with dementia, we must look to the philosophy of personal identity rather than personhood.
Recommended Citation
James Toomey, "As Long as I'm Me": From Personhood to Personal Identity in dementia and Decision-making, 4 Can. J. Bioethics 57 (2021), https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/1234/.
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Elder Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons