Document Type

Article

Abstract

In this Essay, we explore these questions and present a two-part argument. In Parts II and III, we argue that because climate change is exacerbating other drivers of displacement, it is seldom possible to attribute movement to any single factor or to categorize movement conclusively as voluntary or involuntary. Therefore, expanding pathways to safety for all people on the move is the best approach to protect those displaced, directly or indirectly, by climate change and environmental disasters. In Part IV, we argue that, despite attribution and definitional challenges with regard to climate-related mobility, documenting and assessing the role of climate change in driving displacement is paramount to compel those countries that reap the benefits of a fossil-fuel economy—namely, Western Europe and the United States —to prevent climate-related harm and assist displaced people. Both corrective and distributive justice principles support imposing substantial obligations on developed states to uphold the rights of climate-displaced populations, including by providing redress for climate-related harm, funding adaptation measures, and welcoming and supporting those who move in a way that upholds human dignity. A first step in doing so is guaranteeing substantial support for the Loss and Damage Fund set up under the international climate negotiation process.

Download

Share

COinS