Volume 38, Issue 3 (2018) Symposium Edition 2018
Public Corruption Prosecution After McDonnell
The landmark case McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355 (2016), altered the legal landscape in which federal and state prosecutors can pursue public corruption prosecutions. This symposium, held at Elisabeth Haub School of Law on March 9, 2018, brought together law enforcement, practitioners, academics, and media to gain insight from these disparate groups.Conference Proceedings
Introduction
Mimi Rocah
How Has McDonnell Affected Prosecutors’ Ability to Police Public Corruption? What Are Politicians And Lobbyists Allowed To Do, And What Are Prosecutors Able To Prosecute?
Vincent L. Briccetti, Amie Ely, Alexandra Shapiro, and Dan Stein
How Should Congress Respond to McDonnell?
David Yassky, Kathleen Clark, Allen Dickerson, and Jennifer Rodgers
Special Problems for Prosecutors in Public Corruption Prosecutions
Mimi Rocah, Carrie Cohen, Steve Cohen, Daniel Cort, and Bennett L. Gershman
2017 – 2018 Board
- Editor-in-Chief & Managing Editor
- Christopher J. Peticca
- Executive Productions Editors
- Marisa N. Finkelberg
- Rachel I. Kesten
- Executive Acquisitions Editor
- Stefanie Cerrone
- Articles Editors
- Nicholas A. Douglas
- Kristyn Fleming Francese
- Ryan T. Memoli
- Meredith L. Poole
- Case Note & Comment Editors
- Samantha A. Conway
- Lydia M. Rainey
- Senior Members
- Ashley D. Brimm
- Yasmin Estrella
- Amanda G. Fiorilla
- Mabel H. Jimenez
- Rebecca E. King
- Katie A. McLaughlin
- Earl J. Menard III
- Anthony J. Sanfratello III
- Associate Members
- Cassidy Allison
- Maria Isabella-Patricia Baratta
- Amanda Bertan
- David L. Diab
- Elise L. DeEsso
- Luke Holden
- Meghan A. Hook
- Richard M. Hoover
- Georganne Ladis
- Angeliki Ellie Laloudakis
- Monica Lindsay
- Rachel M. Lust
- Jason T. McIntyre
- Samantha A. Mumola
- Siobhan O’Brien
- Natalie Annette Pagano
- Samantha N. Rocco
- Katerina Rae Sperl
- Faculty Advisor
- Leslie Garfield Tenzer